Thursday, July 15, 2010

Combating Racist TEA Party with Patriotic COFFEE Party


Dear Global Patriotic Citizens and Friends of African Union and Greater Ethiopia Without Borders:

Re: Fighting Evil with Good!

The names change from time to time. The real issue is nothing but Evil against Good. The battle of the Universe for Millennia.

Greed the mother of all evil, comes with different colors and shapes in different generations and geographic and cyber domains.

The Greed to accumulate wealth against ecological and social interests have come forwarded in the new version of Neo-Capitalism that will break any natural and man made law of inter-dependence and we get late surprises when the rules of nature for survival are alerting us that the game is over.

This is the case of the Ecological Crisis and Economic as well as Energy Crisis that we face today. The signs and the indications were there all the time, but we chose to ignore them.

Now we are forming TEA and COFFEE Parties to displace the root cause of the problem, that is greed and ignorance of few that is going to sacrifice the future of 9 Billion people who have died and the living 7 Billion.

Just imagine, how we respond to crisis. Look for excuses and blame some thing not connected with the event.

So, the TEA party tries to connect the Genocide of Jews and Europe to a group of people who have been under Genocide for over 500 years,.

Just imagine who is running the Banks, Insurance Agencies, the Military and the BP and SHELL oil Companies? Is it African Americans or to be exact, is it Barack Obama, the Community Organizer?

Surely, this TEA Party deserves a SMART (Specific, Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic and Time Sensitive COFFEE Party.

The time is now to act and do not wait any longer!

The following story is telling as to how the Criminals are organizing once more to put all of us for another 500 years of slavery!

We have tested power and empowerment and we will not let it go with a Divine Fight.

Let us communicate over Coffee at Starbucks and Community Centers and joint the Movement of Good over Evil.

Now is the time to act.

Dr BMJ





NAACP is right to call out racists within Tea Party movement

Since February, I have been sounding the alarm against the radical voices that have attached themselves to the Tea Party movement. That is, the racists and the birthers and the Tenth Amendment-types who show up at Tea Party rallies with their hyperbolic signs comparing President Obama to Hitler, Stalin and other dictators who subjugated their countries through mass murder. Not the majority of folks in the movement who have legitimate concerns about the direction and size of government and the explosion of debt undertaken to sustain it. They are tired of Washington not listening to them. Well, Washington and the nation are listening to them now -- and to the crazies among them.

It’s the racists who have compelled the NAACP to vote unanimously on a resolution calling on leaders in the Tea Party movement to disavow them. As E.J. Dionne brilliantly points out today, the venerable civil rights organization isn’t asking Tea Party leaders to do anything less than what conservatives have consistently called on liberals to do.

The NAACP is doing what conservatives have done for decades in demanding that liberals and progressives separate themselves from left-wing extremists who trashed America, burned flags and praised foreign dictators. The racists are the Tea Party's flag-burners. It's fair to ask the democratic left to condemn extremism. It's fair to ask the same of the democratic right. (Note the small "d.")

Here's a specific example: Remember in the 1990s when Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan was fanning racial animus, spewing anti-Semitism and spinning conspiracy theories about the government actively targeting black men for annihilation? African American lawmakers were called upon nationally and locally, particularly in New York, to denounce Farrakhan. It was unfair to ask elected officials to condemn his every crackpot utterance. But it was also a no-brainer for serious politicians to make clear that Farrakhan didn’t speak for them lest their work and priorities get derailed. Tea Party leaders who don’t want their real concerns crowded out by the radical elements around them must -- MUST -- do the same.

By Jonathan Capehart | July 15, 2010; 8:23 AM ET
Categories: Capehart | Tags: Jonathan Capehart
Save & Share: Send E-mail Facebook Twitter Digg Yahoo Buzz Del.icio.us StumbleUpon Technorati Google Buzz Previous: The guile of Sen. Jon Kyl

Comments

I've been reading a lot of the material being written about this, and honestly, I'm left scratching my head. The vast majority of these articles don't point out a single substantiated instance of racism in the tea party movement. This article at least linked to another post referencing some public opinion poll data. I would suggest the author look into similar polling done on Bush in 2006/2007. Calling the president a socialist because he favors an enlarged government, and the takeover of a few key sectors of the economy (financial services, cap and trade, single payer healthcare, etc) is a far cry from the truly frightening threats that were made against the life of GWB. The left needs to stop using ad-hom attacks and start making policy arguments. Americans are not persuaded by the assertion that a vast majority of the country are racist bigots. Either that, or y'all need to substantiate one of your claims. This is a massive movement, so it shouldn't be difficult to find one bad apple, but as near as I can tell the left hasn't done its research to do that.

Posted by: rybo123 | July 15, 2010 9:20 AM | Report abuse

Blah - "racism", per capita, is more pervasive within the brown community. The majority of the white community doesn't dare utter a racist word. Time for the NAACP and other african american organizations to get their own house in order. btw - the comparison to Farrakhan is a huge stretch, since he is/was the leader of his organization. The leaders of the Tea Party movement stand up every day to denounce racism. Name one tea party leader that has used the term "black devils"

Posted by: Stevenj974 | July 15, 2010 9:21 AM | Report abuse

Mr Capehart, IF you are right that the naacp is calling out The Tea Party Activists on Racism then whatever ARE you going to do when the Republicans win back the house in November 2010 and Boot obama out in 2012?? Maybe Whine Louder???

Racism is a "losers limp", An Excuse, and besides not everyone who hates COMMUNISM is a racist!

Posted by: crackshot1 | July 15, 2010 9:21 AM | Report abuse

".... comparing President Obama to Hitler, Stalin and other dictators" does not necessarily mean someone is a racist. It is obvious the point being made here is that they think Obama is a "Socialist."

What does this have to do with race?

Can the NAACP please provide real evidence of racism?

Posted by: DAS2 | July 15, 2010 9:24 AM | Report abuse

Typical liberal BS and journalism at it's worst. The only racism I see is this journalist and the NAACP. Notice neither condemn the Black Panther tyrades. Plus they cannot produce evidence of the signs they say exists. But then again. I quess if someone is against policy and not the person that's racism. Like they say, you can't fix stupid....

Posted by: sonnyphillips | July 15, 2010 9:26 AM | Report abuse

I do not have a problem with anyone complaining about racists. I have a problem when it is used as a political tool to smear opponents, as this was done to smear the entire tea party movement.

It is racially divisive to play the race card OVER AND OVER. Think about it, when was the last time you even thought about a problem between races? When Obama got elected? or when false claims were made against activists days prior to the UNWANTED healthcare vote? Someone offered $100,000 to anyone that could show proof of racial slurs and spitting, AND NO-ONE HAS CLAIMED THE MONEY. No-one recorded it? No-one had a cell phone camera or video clip of it? The liberal media didnt get it on tape? COME ON. we know it didnt happen!

I believe in the sanctity of life that babies should have rights, that life begins at conception. You call me a "birther"? and put me in the same catagory as racists? What?

You are as divisive as the NAACP! You should work for them!

Posted by: JBfromFL | July 15, 2010 9:29 AM | Report abuse

The rest of America is right to call out the black racists in the NAACP and to call Capehart out on his continuous victimhood racist rants.

Posted by: wjc1va | July 15, 2010 9:32 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.


You must be signed in to washingtonpost.com to comment. Please sign in.
lennia.


NAACP is right to call out racists within Tea Party movement

Since February, I have been sounding the alarm against the radical voices that have attached themselves to the Tea Party movement. That is, the racists and the birthers and the Tenth Amendment-types who show up at Tea Party rallies with their hyperbolic signs comparing President Obama to Hitler, Stalin and other dictators who subjugated their countries through mass murder. Not the majority of folks in the movement who have legitimate concerns about the direction and size of government and the explosion of debt undertaken to sustain it. They are tired of Washington not listening to them. Well, Washington and the nation are listening to them now -- and to the crazies among them.

It’s the racists who have compelled the NAACP to vote unanimously on a resolution calling on leaders in the Tea Party movement to disavow them. As E.J. Dionne brilliantly points out today, the venerable civil rights organization isn’t asking Tea Party leaders to do anything less than what conservatives have consistently called on liberals to do.

The NAACP is doing what conservatives have done for decades in demanding that liberals and progressives separate themselves from left-wing extremists who trashed America, burned flags and praised foreign dictators. The racists are the Tea Party's flag-burners. It's fair to ask the democratic left to condemn extremism. It's fair to ask the same of the democratic right. (Note the small "d.")

Here's a specific example: Remember in the 1990s when Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan was fanning racial animus, spewing anti-Semitism and spinning conspiracy theories about the government actively targeting black men for annihilation? African American lawmakers were called upon nationally and locally, particularly in New York, to denounce Farrakhan. It was unfair to ask elected officials to condemn his every crackpot utterance. But it was also a no-brainer for serious politicians to make clear that Farrakhan didn’t speak for them lest their work and priorities get derailed. Tea Party leaders who don’t want their real concerns crowded out by the radical elements around them must -- MUST -- do the same.

By Jonathan Capehart | July 15, 2010; 8:23 AM ET
Categories: Capehart | Tags: Jonathan Capehart
Save & Share: Send E-mail Facebook Twitter Digg Yahoo Buzz Del.icio.us StumbleUpon Technorati Google Buzz Previous: The guile of Sen. Jon Kyl

Comments

I've been reading a lot of the material being written about this, and honestly, I'm left scratching my head. The vast majority of these articles don't point out a single substantiated instance of racism in the tea party movement. This article at least linked to another post referencing some public opinion poll data. I would suggest the author look into similar polling done on Bush in 2006/2007. Calling the president a socialist because he favors an enlarged government, and the takeover of a few key sectors of the economy (financial services, cap and trade, single payer healthcare, etc) is a far cry from the truly frightening threats that were made against the life of GWB. The left needs to stop using ad-hom attacks and start making policy arguments. Americans are not persuaded by the assertion that a vast majority of the country are racist bigots. Either that, or y'all need to substantiate one of your claims. This is a massive movement, so it shouldn't be difficult to find one bad apple, but as near as I can tell the left hasn't done its research to do that.

Posted by: rybo123 | July 15, 2010 9:20 AM | Report abuse

Blah - "racism", per capita, is more pervasive within the brown community. The majority of the white community doesn't dare utter a racist word. Time for the NAACP and other african american organizations to get their own house in order. btw - the comparison to Farrakhan is a huge stretch, since he is/was the leader of his organization. The leaders of the Tea Party movement stand up every day to denounce racism. Name one tea party leader that has used the term "black devils"

Posted by: Stevenj974 | July 15, 2010 9:21 AM | Report abuse

Mr Capehart, IF you are right that the naacp is calling out The Tea Party Activists on Racism then whatever ARE you going to do when the Republicans win back the house in November 2010 and Boot obama out in 2012?? Maybe Whine Louder???

Racism is a "losers limp", An Excuse, and besides not everyone who hates COMMUNISM is a racist!

Posted by: crackshot1 | July 15, 2010 9:21 AM | Report abuse

".... comparing President Obama to Hitler, Stalin and other dictators" does not necessarily mean someone is a racist. It is obvious the point being made here is that they think Obama is a "Socialist."

What does this have to do with race?

Can the NAACP please provide real evidence of racism?

Posted by: DAS2 | July 15, 2010 9:24 AM | Report abuse

Typical liberal BS and journalism at it's worst. The only racism I see is this journalist and the NAACP. Notice neither condemn the Black Panther tyrades. Plus they cannot produce evidence of the signs they say exists. But then again. I quess if someone is against policy and not the person that's racism. Like they say, you can't fix stupid....

Posted by: sonnyphillips | July 15, 2010 9:26 AM | Report abuse

I do not have a problem with anyone complaining about racists. I have a problem when it is used as a political tool to smear opponents, as this was done to smear the entire tea party movement.

It is racially divisive to play the race card OVER AND OVER. Think about it, when was the last time you even thought about a problem between races? When Obama got elected? or when false claims were made against activists days prior to the UNWANTED healthcare vote? Someone offered $100,000 to anyone that could show proof of racial slurs and spitting, AND NO-ONE HAS CLAIMED THE MONEY. No-one recorded it? No-one had a cell phone camera or video clip of it? The liberal media didnt get it on tape? COME ON. we know it didnt happen!

I believe in the sanctity of life that babies should have rights, that life begins at conception. You call me a "birther"? and put me in the same catagory as racists? What?

You are as divisive as the NAACP! You should work for them!

Posted by: JBfromFL | July 15, 2010 9:29 AM | Report abuse

The rest of America is right to call out the black racists in the NAACP and to call Capehart out on his continuous victimhood racist rants.

Posted by: wjc1va | July 15, 2010 9:32 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.


You must be signed in to washingtonpost.com to comment. Please sign in.

No comments: